Asus Gtx 560 Directcu Driver For Mac

1. Asus Gtx 560 Directcu Driver For Macbook Pro

ASUS GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP 2 GB, 900 MHz, 1002 MHz, 2 GB, 10.16 inches/258 mm. Club 3D GTX 560 Ti, 823 MHz, 1002 MHz, 9.094 inches/231 mm. ASUS GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP overclocked graphics card for superb 3D Vision™. Based on ASUS DirectCU architecture, which uses copper heat pipes in.

Asus Gtx 560 Directcu Driver For Macbook Pro

Based on our tests, it's pretty clear that the GTX 560 has a raw performance edge over the competition from AMD overall. However, that performance advantage isn't huge, and the Asus Radeon HD 6870 TOP has the distinction of being uncannily quiet for a $200 graphics card.

Oh, sure, it draws a little more power at idle, but that doesn't seem to affect noise levels. In the other corner, the GeForce GTX 560 TOP is faster, nearly as quiet, and costs only $20 more. It has company, too. MSI's GeForce GTX 560 Frozr II is almost as quick, only a little bit louder, and $10 cheaper. While neither card has hexa-display support, both let you enjoy Nvidia-specific perks like PhysX and GeForce 3D Vision. Some users like those extras, while others couldn't care less. You can make up your own mind on that front.

The Palit GTX 560 card is a clear improvement over the 1GB GTX 460. It’s likely the 2GB frame buffer only had a minor impact; most of the improvements are due to the GTX 560’s higher clock speeds and streamlining of the internal circuitry since the FTX 460.

Palit’s suggesting a $199 retail price for the card. Most GTX 560 cards will likely ship with 1GB of GDDR5, but will be factory overclocked. With the Palit 2GB card, you’re trading off core clock speeds for additional frame buffer. Even without overclocking, though, Palit’s GTX 560 2GB card acquits itself quite well indeed. The new GeForce GTX 560 performs right about where its model number suggests.

The Asus GTX 560 DirectCU II TOP and MSI N560GTX Twin Frozr II performed a fair bit better than the GeForce GTX 460 1GB and just a step behind the more powerful GeForce GTX 560 Ti. In general, the Asus and MSI GeForce GTX 560 cards also performed better than their direct competition from Team AMD, the Radeon HD 6850 and 6870. There were a couple of instances where the 6870 came out on top (F1 2010, Metro 2033), but the GeForce came out ahead in the rest of our benchmarks. If you’ve got about $210 to spend on a graphics card, the new GeForce GTX 560 is an attractive option. Overall however, the ASUS GTX 560 DirectCU II TOP video is a solid piece of hardware, not just because of the metal shroud but also figuratively speaking as it stands tall even and can go toe-to-toe with the more expensive GTX560 Ti and HD6870.

Despite the performance of the SmartDoctor software, people will buy this card for the hardware and not the bundled software so it doesn’t really matter to the end user, especially since they can just use a different program to tweak their GTX 560 DirectCU II TOP video card. In terms of value, the ASUS GTX 560 DirectCU II TOP video card carries a $20 premium over the reference GTX 560 although considering you are getting the performance equivalent of a GTX 560 Ti which currently costs $240 while also getting a better and quieter cooling solution, you can look at it as $20 saved. NVIDIA seems to have hit all the high points by improving upon the GTX 460 in every way possible. Anyone doubting the GPU market’s price / performance ratio isn’t moving forward fast enough need not look any further than the GTX 560.

In barely 10 months we have seen the GTX 460 1GB -which launched at $230- surpassed by the $199 GTX 560. The difference isn’t insignificant either; the new GF114-based card offers a nearly 20% improvement in framerates over the previous generation without a noticeable increase in power consumption.